Close this search box.

Abortion as a Right by Russell L. Blaylock, MD

One of the chief issues used by the socialistic Democrats and the tyrannical Left is abortion as a right. They refer to this by the euphemism—“a right to choose.” In fact, several “republicans” have stated that their weakness was in not supporting abortion, and Trump stated that individual states should choose. One woman I spoke with wished a compromise on the issue to get more voters.

The right to choose is based on the idea that it is a woman’s body, and she should have the right to choose whether she wants to keep the child or kill it. The method of killing also does not seem to faze them—just get rid of it. One supporter even said that adoption of the baby should not be an option—they want the baby dead.[1] As with all of their illogical defenses they use the most compassionate cases possible to make their argument—rape and incest or the dangers of carrying a pregnancy to term. But the number of babies resulting from rape was extremely small as a percentage.[2] For rape and incest adoption would be a better alternative but the baby-killers says “no,” that would not eliminate the risk of carrying the baby to term.

Most pregnancies were the result of ignoring birth control methods and yielding to passion without the possibility that the unbridled passion may result in a pregnancy. They had a “choice”—don’t engage in unprotected sex, but they chose to ignore it and ignored the possibility of a resulting pregnancy. Now that they found themselves in a panic situation, their only answer is the murder of an innocent baby by abortion— a totally selfish act. We say, then don’t “choose” to engage in sex. If a woman is unable to control herself then get her tubes tied; the man should have a vasectomy.

Opponents of the practice of abortion began by carrying signs at the entrance of the abortion clinics showing pictures of babies torn to pieces during the procedure. The abortion advocates assaulted the peaceful protesters and tore up their signs. Next, the advocates attempted to get the courts to apply an injunction meant for criminal cases to stop the protestors from showing the panicked pregnant girls what they were actually doing to the poor babies.

Recently, several quite elderly peaceful women were arrested and jailed under cruel conditions (they were ill) for daring to sing gospel songs and praying at the entrance to the clinics.[3,4] Abortionists view the religious as the enemy. In their way of thinking, the babies are amorphous tissue without a hint of resemblance to a child. The pictures, and later film, taught the viewing public that these babies were advanced in their development, and in abortions just before birth, they were fully formed. The abortionists cried foul. The public had no right to know, at least in their perverted logic.

We have heard from abortionist who have seen the light, what is actually being done during the procedure. Special forceps are used to rip off the arms and legs of the living, and the baby at this stage feels the pain as shown in the film, the Silent Scream.[5]  Another instrument is used to crush the baby’s head and the mucous-like matter that oozes out of the vagina is the baby’s brain. In some recent cases, the brain is preserved so it can be sold to labs, along with its other organs. An obvious barbaric act reminiscent of the Nazi death camps.

The pile of parts is placed in a storage cooler, which some callous abortion nurses have referred to as “the nursery.” This Nazi-style, cold-hearted treatment goes on all over the United States, and results in the death of almost a million babies a year just in the U.S. alone.[6]

Later, when they realize what they have done to the child, many of the “potential mothers” undergo psychiatric treatment and some even commit suicide. It is a terrible thing to live with as testified by many of these girls.

Yet the leftist radicals attempted to kill a U.S. Supreme Court justice because of the court’s legal action to put an end to this barbaric practice.[7] The justices were even threatened by a U.S. Senator (Senator Schumer), and a violence-promoting mob by other senators as rabid leftist proponents for abortion stood outside the Supreme Court in a frenzy.[8]  They have a right to protest, but they do not have a right to threaten the justices or their philosophical opponents with violence.

We have also seen many pro-abortion young women give a salute to Satan, their new god.[9] In addition, a center has been established allowing women to dedicate their murdered “babies’’ soul to Satan.[10] This was even promoted in a women’s magazine, Cosmopolitan.[11] 

Occultism, the real driving force of this practice, has reared its ugly head. These proponents of mass murder of children have now exposed their real motivation for the practice. They have abandoned the true God (who they see as an enemy) and now worship their “false” god—Satan. Depopulation, also a Satanic practice, is the driving force behind this.

The Ten Commandments state that we should not murder. Far too many, even ministers, state that the commandment says, “Thou shall not kill,” when in truth it says, “Thou shall not murder.” Murder is the taking of an innocent life. And who is more innocent than the unborn baby? It is a selfish drive that leads to murder as the final act of the consequence of one’s sinful choice. The baby is guilty of nothing—it is innocent.

Recently, I had an exchange with a woman who lamented that the Republicans were losing voters because of their rigid stand on abortion and that they should compromise on the issue. Of course, the radical Left would never accept a compromise of any type. As one of the radical abortionists stated, he didn’t even want them adopted. He wanted them dead.

But the main issue is the concept of a compromise. I think Eric von Kuehnelt-Leddihn in his book, Leftism Revisited, had an excellent answer to this statement.[12] He said if one man says that he wanted to kill no Jews and another said, I want to kill 6 million, would a reasonable compromise be, “We will agree to kill just 3 million Jews?” The result, Kuehnelt-Leddihn stated, would still be 3 million dead Jews. Is that the compromise type of compromise this woman wanted—not a million dead babies, but instead only 500 thousand? How are we any different then? There are some things that cannot be compromised—such as murder. This is not to be negotiated. Firm principles are not negotiable.


  1. Malinda Seymore, Law Professor at Texas A&M Univ School of Law.
  2. Pregnancy resulting from rape:
  3. “Elderly, pro-life activist, 75, sentenced to prison after abortion clinic demonstration,” New York Post, June 6, 2024.
  4. Pinedo P. “Elderly pro-life activist sentenced to over two years in prison under FACE Act,” Catholic News Agency, May 15, 2024.
  5. The Silent Scream video:
  6. Diamant J, Mohamed B, Leppert R. “What the data says about abortions in the US,” Pew Research Center, March 25, 2024.
  7. Sherman M, Balsamo M, Kunzelman M. “Armed man arrested for threat to kill Justice Kavanaugh,” Associated Press, June 8, 2022
  8. CNN. “Schumer tell justices they will ‘pay the price’ in angry rebuke,”
  9. “Satanic Temple goes after abortion bans,” AXIOS Boston, October 3, 2022.
  10. Hayes K. “Satanic Temple launches health abortion care in New Mexico, hopes to expand,” Fox News, February 1, 2023.  
  11. Hall A. “Cosmopolitan magazine shares steps for how to have ‘satanic abortion ceremony,’ ” December 3, 2023.
  12. Kuehnelt-Leddihn E. Leftism Revisited: From de Sade and Marx to Hitler and Pol Pot [Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway, 1990].

Written by Dr. Russell L. Blaylock

Russell L. Blaylock, M.D. is the president of Theoretical Neuroscience Research, LLC, Canton, Mississippi, a retired neurosurgeon, and the Associate Editor-in-Chief of the Neuro-Inflammation section of Surgical Neurology International (SNI). He has written numerous path-blazing scientific papers and books, including Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills (1994), Bioterrorism: How You Can Survive (2001), Health and Nutrition Secrets (2002), Natural Strategies for Cancer Patients (2003), and The Liver Cure (2022).

This article may be cited as: Blaylock, RL. Abortion as a Right., July 7, 2024. Available from:

Copyright ©2024

Share This Story:

Scroll to Top