Ohio --- A Testimonial

Nino M. Camardese, MD
Article Type: 
Report from the States
July/August 2000
Volume Number: 
Issue Number: 

In my testimony before the Ohio State Committee of the Legislature on April 12, 2000, as a past president of AAPS, I explained: "to memorialize Congress to repeal existing laws and oppose the adoption of future laws that interfere with the right of Medicare beneficiaries to enter into private, voluntary legal arrangements with their physicians."

Speaking as to the patient-physician relationship and the practice of medicine, I stated, "All patients should have the right to contract privately with the doctor of his/her or their choice, including Medicare patients." I cited Section 1801 of Medicare establishing a "prohibition against any Federal interference," Section 1802 "Free choice by Patient guarantee," and Section 1803 "Option to Individuals to obtain other health insurance protection."

One reason I felt private contracting should be clearly delineated is because "when patients have control over their medical spending, they become more prudent consumers of medical care thereby reducing utilization and medical care costs."

In addition to constitutional and legal references supporting private contracting, I cited Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution which states in part, "No State shallpass any law impairing the obligations of contracts..."

The following precedents cited in the U.S. Supreme Court support the practice of private medicine:

* Linder v. United States 268 U.S. 5, 18, 45 S. Ct. 446 (1925) The Court ruled: "Obviously, direct control of medical practice in the states is beyond the power of the federal government."

* U.S. v. Anthony, 15 F. Supp. 553, 555 (S.D. Ca., 1936) and U.S. v. Evers, 453 F. Supp. 1141, 1150 (M.D. Ala., 1978), the Court ruled: "the direct control of medical practice has been left to the States."

In conclusion, I testified, "House Concurrent Resolution #58 is a most timely and propitious resolution which reemphasizes the great need for all Americans, particularly our elected and appointed officials, to do our utmost to preserve, protect, and pass on our great heritage of freedom, under our limited constitutional government - to future generations..."

Dr. Camardese is a member of the editorial board of the Medical Sentinel and a member of the AAPS Board of Directors. E-mail address: americanism@hmcltd.net.

Originally published in the Medical Sentinel 2000;5(4);142. Copyright©2000 Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)

No votes yet

It is now legend the AAPS legally lanced the secret task force and pulled its secrets...into the sunshine. It destoyed the Health Security Act.

The Oath of Hippocrates
and the Transformation of Medical Ethics Through Time

Patients within a managed care system have the illusion there exists a doctor-patient relationship...But in reality, it is the managers who decide how medical care will be given.

Judicial activism...the capricious rule of man rather than the just rule of law.

The largest single problem facing American medicine today is the actions of government...

The lessons of history sagaciously reveal wherever governments have sought to control medical care and medical practice...the results have been as perverse as they have been disastrous.

Children are the centerpiece of the family, the treasure (and renewal) of countless civilizations, but they should not be used flagrantly to advance political agendas...

Prejudice against gun ownership by ordinary citizens is pervasive in the public health community, even when they profess objectivity and integrity in their scientific research.

The infusion of tax free money into the MSA of the working poor give this population tax equity with wealthier persons...

It was when Congress started dabbling in constitutionally forbidden activities that deficit spending produced a national debt!

Does the AMA have a secret pact with HCFA?

The lure of socialism is that it tells the people there is nothing they cannot have and that all social evils will be redressed by the state.

Canada's fatal error — Health Care as a Right!

The Cancer Risk from Low Level Radiation: A Review of Recent Evidence...

...Moreover, the gun control researchers failed to consider and underestimated the protective benefits of firearms.

Vandals at the Gates of Medicine — Have They Been Repulsed or Are They Over the Top?