Extending Affordable Health Insurance to the Uninsurable

Conrad F. Meier
Article Type: 
Feature Article
November/December 1999
Volume Number: 
Issue Number: 

Approximately 2.5 million people in the U.S. --- about 1 percent of the population --- suffer from pre-existing medical conditions making it likely their future medical expenses will be extremely high. While private insurers are ill-equipped to serve this population, 28 state governments play a positive role by chartering non-profit health insurance plans, or HIPs. In order to keep premiums affordable, HIPs are often authorized to impose a small assessment on the premiums earned by private insurers. Capping HIP premiums at no more than 125 to 135 percent of standard individual insurance premiums appears to be a "best practice" for keeping HIPs affordable. HIPs accomplish the social goal of assuring access to quality medical care for those who need it, without the disruptions and negative side effects caused by regulation of the insurance industry.

Ordinary Insurance Markets May Not Work For People With Pre-Existing Medical Conditions

More than 187 million Americans rely on private health insurance for their health care needs. Over the years, state and federal governments have enacted a number of measures to help people obtain and keep health insurance, but some people --- about 1 percent of the total population --- lose coverage when they have serious medical problems, and cannot or do not take advantage of available safety nets.

In many states, the answer is state-chartered Health Insurance Plans. HIPs are a targeted response to a specific problem; HIPs increase access to health insurance by allowing insurers to place people with pre-existing medical conditions into pools and subsidizing their premiums with tax subsidies or small assessments on premium revenue. Currently, 28 states offer access to insurance through HIPs.

HIPs Provide Affordable Health Insurance Without Regulation or Bureaucracy

Many states are attempting to ensure access to medical care for the medically uninsurable simply by forcing companies that sell individual health insurance to write policies for them. By doing so, those states are creating serious problems for the vast majority of their residents who do not suffer from medically uninsurable conditions. Recent studies show that such regulations increase premiums, increase the number of uninsureds in a state, and do serious damage to the insurance marketplace.

The Council for Affordable Health Insurance (CAHI) uses the image of an inverted pyramid to illustrate the problem (Figure 1). "The people in the individual market comprise a very small area at the bottom of this inverted pyramid. To force that small group of people to fund the burden of all of the uninsurable people coming from the rest of the pyramid [large groups, small groups, self-funded programs, government programs, etc.] simply cannot work because it requires a price that is far too high for this market to bear."

Figure 1. The individual insurance market is too small to cover uninsurable individuals coming out of all other types of insurance.


When financed by small assessments on the premiums paid to private group insurers, HIPs spread the cost of covering uninsurables across a much larger base of insureds. The result: accomplishing the social goal of assuring access to quality medical care for those who need it, without the disruptions and negative side effects caused by heavy-handed regulation of the insurance industry.

States With Successful HIPs Follow These Best Practices

Best Practice #1: Cap premiums at 125 percent. All HIPs cap the premium rates that can be charged to HIP participants. The caps generally range between 125 percent and 150 percent of average individual insurance premiums, though some are higher. Keeping the premium cap to 125 percent above standard increases a HIP's reach into the uninsurable population. Setting caps between 125 percent and 135 percent emerges as a second best choice.

Best Practice #2: Finance the program by assessing a small surcharge on insurance premium revenues. Of the 28 states with HIPs, only three use general tax revenues to offset fund losses. The others rely primarily on assessments against the premiums charged by private insurers. State HIP directors report that it is more risky to rely on state appropriations rather than adequate premiums and assessments, since appropriations must be lobbied for each year. In states where general revenue funds are used, the number of people who can be admitted to the plan is politically determined, and thus likely to be influenced by factors having nothing to do with either need or the efficiency of the private insurance market.

Best Practice #3: Offer a choice of service providers. To hold down premium costs, some states have begun to offer eligible residents their choice of insurance options, ranging from traditional fee-for-service plans to cost-conscious HMO managed care plans with varying deductible levels. Access to affordable health insurance can be enhanced by amending HIPs to offer Medical Savings Accounts and the high-deductible, low premium catastrophic insurance coverage MSAs provide. HIPs should clearly state that MSAs may be used in conjunction with health insurance plan coverage.

Health Insurance Plans Can Help States Comply With HIPAA

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) required that all states implement policies that guarantee access by small businesses and "eligible individuals" to health insurance of some kind. HIPAA further requires that "eligible individuals" be guaranteed access to some type of coverage regardless of pre-existing medical conditions.

To be considered an "eligible individual," an applicant must have had 18 months of prior coverage under a group plan, have elected and exhausted continued benefits coverage under COBRA (typically 18 months), and not be eligible for any other group health coverage.

HIPAA grants states flexibility in addressing the requirements for "eligible individuals." Most states made one of two choices. About half require insurers serving the individual health insurance market to guarantee-issue at least one plan. The other half opted to expand or create qualified HIPs (following the National Association of Insurance Commissioner's Model Health Plan for Uninsurable Individuals Act) to meet the needs of those persons.

The differences in enrollment are astonishing. Carriers report ensuring coverage to "eligible individuals" in states requiring the guarantee-issue model (first option above) in very small numbers. By contrast, the Illinois HIP enrolled nearly 1,000 HIPAA "eligible persons" in the first year alone. Early results suggest that HIPs are a much more effective way to reach out and insure uninsurable "eligible individuals" than is heavy-handed regulation of private insurance markets.

Conclusion: More States Should Adopt HIPs

Private insurance markets appear to do a good job providing affordable and high-quality insurance to most of the population of the United States. There is a small group of people, though, whose high-cost medical expenses are very predictable.

We can attempt to ensure access to medical care for the medically uninsurable simply by forcing private insurers to write policies for them. But a better way to provide access to care for people with special medical needs is through a state-chartered, nonprofit health insurance plan.

By 1998, the number of states with HIPs had grown to 28, providing coverage to over 100,000 people with special medical needs and extraordinarily high medical costs. HIP benefits are comparable and often superior to employer-provided plans offered in the private sector and, in most cases, demonstrably superior to Medicare and Medicaid coverage.

Some state legislators remain a step away from fully endorsing the integration of a Health Insurance Plan into their states' private health insurance market. The author hopes the research and commentary presented here helps fill the knowledge gap that presently prevents some 22 states from doing the right thing.

Mr. Meier is health policy advisor for the Chicago-based Heartland Institute and Assistant in Research, Center for Advance Social Research, University of Missouri. E-mail: cmeier@coin.org. This article is excerpted from the 20-page Heartland Institute Policy Study entitled, "Extending Affordable Health Insurance to the Uninsurable," published August 27, 1999. It is available from The Heartland at (312) 377-4000 or at http://www.heartland.org/studies/meier-ps.htm

Originally published in the Medical Sentinel 1999;4(6):216-217. Copyright ©1999 Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

Your rating: None Average: 5 (2 votes)
Comments on this post

Business Risk

Running a business today involves a certain amount of risk: many unforeseen events can occur that present challenges to the modern business owner. Accidents in the workplace, employee illness, mechanical failure of plant and equipment, even lawsuits from disgruntled clients: all of these may have to be dealt with at one time or another, and they cost money. Sorry but medical care is no different!

It is now legend the AAPS legally lanced the secret task force and pulled its secrets...into the sunshine. It destoyed the Health Security Act.

The Oath of Hippocrates
and the Transformation of Medical Ethics Through Time

Patients within a managed care system have the illusion there exists a doctor-patient relationship...But in reality, it is the managers who decide how medical care will be given.

Judicial activism...the capricious rule of man rather than the just rule of law.

The largest single problem facing American medicine today is the actions of government...

The lessons of history sagaciously reveal wherever governments have sought to control medical care and medical practice...the results have been as perverse as they have been disastrous.

Children are the centerpiece of the family, the treasure (and renewal) of countless civilizations, but they should not be used flagrantly to advance political agendas...

Prejudice against gun ownership by ordinary citizens is pervasive in the public health community, even when they profess objectivity and integrity in their scientific research.

The infusion of tax free money into the MSA of the working poor give this population tax equity with wealthier persons...

It was when Congress started dabbling in constitutionally forbidden activities that deficit spending produced a national debt!

Does the AMA have a secret pact with HCFA?

The lure of socialism is that it tells the people there is nothing they cannot have and that all social evils will be redressed by the state.

Canada's fatal error — Health Care as a Right!

The Cancer Risk from Low Level Radiation: A Review of Recent Evidence...

...Moreover, the gun control researchers failed to consider and underestimated the protective benefits of firearms.

Vandals at the Gates of Medicine — Have They Been Repulsed or Are They Over the Top?