AAPS and the Court

Author: 
David N. Reifsnyder, MD
Article Type: 
Correspondence
Issue: 
Spring 2001
Volume Number: 
6
Issue Number: 
1

Dear AAPS,
I have been a member of AAPS for several years now. I do appreciate what AAPS has done through the court system to help physicians. I believe it is mainly through the courts in a manner similar to the civil rights movement, American Civil Liberties Union, the Southern Law Poverty Center, and others that physicians' rights can be protected and consequently patients' rights and health. Therefore, I encourage AAPS to pursue legally those paths in the courts that will achieve the goals that AAPS stands for --- namely, physicians' and patients' inviolate relationship to maintain good health and treat illness in patients as the physician sees best.

Obviously, we cannot all go the the courts. But there are many things that we can do individually to achieve these goals. I find that AAPS rails against government especially Medicare and against insurance companies with little constructive action for individual physicians. We can all go yelling and decrying what Medicare and the insurance companies are doing but the fact of the matter is they are here to stay. Therefore, we need to develop actions and plans that will be of value to individual physicians (and thus benefit patients).

It is to be remembered that there are less than one million physicians in the United States compared to 37 million seniors. Congressmen and state legislators will vote to please 37 million people. Our only recourse, then, is the court system and individual action.

Thus, I recommend that AAPS continue to keep us informed on developments in Congress, but without making it such a dominant part of the newsletters. And, that AAPS inform the membership of legal action it is taking on various issues. Finally, that AAPS help guide physicians regarding how best to practice within the current framework. Examples of the latter include: (1) making as many patients on Medicare non-assigned, (2) guiding doctors to balance Medicare and non-Medicare patients so as to protect income, and (3) recommending that doctors avoid any managed care contracts. (The doctors who have done that in this community continue to do well financially, are happier, spend more time with their patients, and treat patients as they know is most appropriate.) There are other suggestions for physicians for articles on individual physician's success in approaching practice in the present context without compromising quality. These would be useful. Even the Medical Sentinel could have more of these kind of articles much like Medical Economics used to have before they moved on to stories about managed care and the like.

Many doctors do not know that there are options for them that are viable, can result in satisfactory income, and personal satisfaction. If more doctors took these steps the tide would eventually change. These are not easy solutions nor can they be taken lightly, but for the individual physician they can be of great value emotionally. We are not going to make millions like sports figures, but I do not know of any doctor who cannot make a decent living and I am sure we will always continue to make a decent living in the future if we take the proper steps.

I trust this is helpful as you lead the AAPS onward and upward.

David N. Reifsnyder, MD
Clearwater, FL

Correspondence originally published in the Medical Sentinel 2001;6(1);1-4. Copyright©2001 Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS).

No votes yet

It is now legend the AAPS legally lanced the secret task force and pulled its secrets...into the sunshine. It destoyed the Health Security Act.


The Oath of Hippocrates
and the Transformation of Medical Ethics Through Time


Patients within a managed care system have the illusion there exists a doctor-patient relationship...But in reality, it is the managers who decide how medical care will be given.


Judicial activism...the capricious rule of man rather than the just rule of law.


The largest single problem facing American medicine today is the actions of government...


The lessons of history sagaciously reveal wherever governments have sought to control medical care and medical practice...the results have been as perverse as they have been disastrous.


Children are the centerpiece of the family, the treasure (and renewal) of countless civilizations, but they should not be used flagrantly to advance political agendas...


Prejudice against gun ownership by ordinary citizens is pervasive in the public health community, even when they profess objectivity and integrity in their scientific research.


The infusion of tax free money into the MSA of the working poor give this population tax equity with wealthier persons...


It was when Congress started dabbling in constitutionally forbidden activities that deficit spending produced a national debt!


Does the AMA have a secret pact with HCFA?


The lure of socialism is that it tells the people there is nothing they cannot have and that all social evils will be redressed by the state.


Canada's fatal error — Health Care as a Right!


The Cancer Risk from Low Level Radiation: A Review of Recent Evidence...


...Moreover, the gun control researchers failed to consider and underestimated the protective benefits of firearms.


Vandals at the Gates of Medicine — Have They Been Repulsed or Are They Over the Top?