Death Taxes — Heavy progressive taxation and the erosion of rights of inheritance

Exclusive for
Article Type: 
Published Date: 
Thursday, November 19, 2015

Inheritance and estate taxes (collectively referred to as the “death tax”) are the taxes one must pay to the government to be able to inherit property or money following the death of loved ones. With inheritance taxes, the beneficiary pays the tax before taking possession of the money or property. With the estate tax, the tax is levied on the decedent’s assets before the beneficiaries may receive their inheritance. Either way, the State (the government) takes Death Taxits share: The bigger the legacy, the larger the government’s slice of the pie! Despite the alleged fairness, these inordinate taxes are government money-grabbing wealth redistribution schemes fueled by the politics of envy and promoted by progressive politicians usually of the Democratic persuasion. Inordinate estate tax rates are a measure of the level of socialism afflicting a given society. This is so because demagogic politicians pander to the dark side of human nature, eliciting envy to pander to the resentful, eyeing the money they can grab, seeing the votes they can buy, muscling the power they can exert over the masses, and enjoying the perks they can obtain for themselves. It is sold supposedly to the people as a “tax on the rich” that does not affect the middle class. And indeed because of the exemptions or exclusion amounts allowed upon which no tax is levied, estate taxes are presently relatively generous, and only 2% of Americans pay any federal death taxes after their demise.

In 2001, the exclusion amount was $675,000 and the Maximum Tax Rate (MTR) was 55%. By the end of George W. Bush’s term in 2008, the exemption was $2 million, and the MTR, thankfully, had been reduced to 45%.  Still the rich pay the lion’s share of these taxes, and the middle class is largely shielded by the exemption (or exclusion). During and despite the Barack Obama administration, Congress gradually increased the exclusion amount in 2016 to $5.45 million with a MTR capped at 40%. Yet, despite this seemingly generous exclusion, the amount of death taxation is still too high for a country that cherishes individual initiative, economic freedom, and limited government. This is particularly true for family-run businesses that are passed on and require further capitalization after the death of the owner such as for updating equipment, keeping up with technological advances, not to mention abiding by government mandates and regulations!

But there is more: The exclusion amount for gifts bequeathed to friends, not immediate members of the family, is limited to $14,000. This means that those whose friendship we cherished in our lives and those who provided services we wished to reward after death are burdened with exorbitant taxation ranging from 20% to 40%, beyond the exempted $14,000.Gfit Tax Therefore, this type of “inheritance” tax is not paid solely by the “rich,” as claimed, but by ordinary Americans — all of us — receiving gifts from benefactors. The truth then is that high death taxes (whether from estate, gift, or inheritance) hurt us all, including the little people the Democrats claim to represent. Among the so-called rich, beyond the $5.45 million exemption, the financial imposition of estate taxes may cause small businesses to falter, farms to be taken away, homes to be foreclosed, and even valuable heirlooms and all types of inherited properties lost because of the exorbitant federal expropriations promoted by money-grabbing, redistributive, socialist politicians, who persist in calling themselves Democrats, when in fact socialist is a more accurate description.

In this regard, the presidential campaign of a self-avowed socialist, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), has been honestly edifying, illuminating the degree of socialism, envy, and class warfare that has presently enveloped our society and been accepted by less-than-informed Americans. Senator Sanders has in fact called for graduated taxation of up to a 65% death tax rate, figuratively and almost literally, taxing billionaires to their grave! If Sanders proposals were to be enacted, it would take us a couple of steps closer in one fell swoop towards Karl Marx’s socialist ideals outlined in his Communist Manifesto: heavy progressive taxation and erosion of the rights of inheritance!

We have confined ourselves to the federal government, but the state governments have additionally begun to use the Marxsist formula for expropriating wealth from the deceased, and depending on the state where one lives, the death tax is frequently more prohibitive than at the federal level because the exclusion amounts permitted by the states are much lower.

The liberal media and “progressive” popular culture has succeeded in creating an atmosphere in which a large section of Americans envy the wealth of others, rather than living the dream of setting achievable financial goals for themselves and by sheer hard work making them happen. There is the misperception that wealthy Americans owe their wealth to old money and inheritance; this is myth promulgated by the envious and resentful. The fact is that according to every study conducted since the 1980s, including those by BMO Private Bank (2013), Financial Advisors (2014), and Forbes (2015), 70% of American millionaires and billionaires markedly increased their wealth by their own initiative or are completely self-made. In our American social and economic highly mobile society, less than 10% percent of the “rich” inherited their wealth. Most American millionaires and billionaires, exemplified by Bill Gates, Oprah Winfrey, Rupert Murdoch, Mark Zuckerberg and others, are self-made men and women, who through diligence, hard work, entrepreneurship, innovation, and ingenuity created their own wealth and financial empires. This economic freedom that allows us to keep the wealth of the fruit of our labors, use it as capital (capitalism) for further investment, use it as we see fit in pleasure, and even pass it on as bequeathment to our family or friends, is what made this country what it is today — the wealthiest and freest country on Earth!


1. IRS Announces 2016 Estate And Gift Tax Limits: The $10.9 Million Tax Break. Forbes, October 22, 2015. Available from:

2. The Estate Tax in the United States. Available from:

3. There Are More Self-Made Billionaires In The Forbes 400 Than Ever Before. Forbes. October 13, 2014. Available from:

Written by Dr. Miguel Faria

Miguel A. Faria, Jr., M.D. is Clinical Professor of Surgery (Neurosurgery, ret.) and Adjunct Professor of Medical History (ret.) Mercer University School of Medicine. He is an Associate Editor in Chief and a World Affairs Editor of Surgical Neurology International (SNI), and an Ex-member of the Injury Research Grant Review Committee of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2002-05; Former Editor-in-Chief of the Medical Sentinel (1996-2002), Editor Emeritus, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS); Author, Vandals at the Gates of Medicine (1995); Medical Warrior: Fighting Corporate Socialized Medicine (1997); and Cuba in Revolution: Escape From a Lost Paradise (2002).

This article may be cited as: Faria MA. Death Taxes — Heavy progressive taxation and the erosion of rights of inheritance., November 19, 2015. Available from:

Copyright ©2015 Miguel A. Faria, Jr., M.D.

Your rating: None Average: 4.6 (9 votes)
Comments on this post

Left-wing presidents and high taxes

Talking about high taxes and the Democratic Party moving to the left and leaving the American middle class behind, I came across this political spectrum graph from the BBC and Getty. Thanks Hacienda Publishing for adding Obama to it and allowing me to post the graph!

NOTE: Obama's image and position on graph was added to the original Getty/BBC image by

Food for thought

Food for thought: Consider the first 4 of the 10 planks of Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto:

Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose.
Consider the application of environmental laws and expansion of eminent domain by the government and regulatory agencies such as the Bureau of Land Management to confiscate private property, not to mention the use of the RICO statues in asset forfeiture proceedings to rob citizens of the fruits of their labors, citizens accused but not necessarily convicted of any crime, to subsidize the plunder of others. The War on drugs has also been used towards the same end of expropriating private property from the people without due process of law.

A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
The graduated income tax formerly prohibited by the Constitution was authorized by the passage of the 16th Amendment under the false pretenses (such as that only the super-rich would be taxed). It was part of the freedom-eroding troika along with the establishment of the Federal Reserve (allowing the political manipulation of interest rates and the printing of fiat money) and the 17th Amendment (i.e., the popular election of U.S Senators that virtually eliminated the representation of the states in the federal government and tilted the balance of power toward the federal government at the expense of the states.

Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
The current federal estate and gift tax has been reduced to 40% from the 55%, only a few years ago, as related in the article. Some states have additional inheritance taxes on top of all the other taxes mentioned. Why should the federal government be authorized in a free society to tax and determine the disposition of property upon a person’s death?

Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
One wonders why expatriate tax provisions were included surreptitiously in the purportedly medical insurance proposals of the Kassebaum-Kennedy Law. Why should federal agencies such as the IRS, the EPA, or even law enforcement be authorized to confiscate private property from suspected (not convicted) Americans under the Patriot Act and National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 without due process of law?

Illegal government asset forfeiture outpaces criminals!

“Police Now Illegally Seize More Money than the Criminals, BY DAMON GELLER, Wholesaledirectmetals, December, 2015.

“Times continue to be terrifyingly desperate for fiscally insolvent federal and state governments. According to a recent bombshell from the Washington Post, the police and the entire executive branch of government seize billions of dollars a year from citizens, without any shred of due process or proof that a crime has been committed!

"The total unconstitutional police seizures now exceed $4.5 billion per year, more than all burglary offenses.  This means that the police are now seizing more assets than the criminals! Why? Because our state & federal governments are broke, bankrupt and in desperate need of capital. So they’re expanding The Police State to unlawfully gain access to citizens’ money…”

Asset forfeiture --- a threat to freedom:

Washington, D.C., Approves Landmark Civil Asset Forfeiture Law by John Clarke, Reuters, Business Insider, Nov. 18, 2014

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - District of Columbia lawmakers approved legislation on Tuesday that makes it harder for police to seize assets from people who are not ultimately charged with crimes, a bill that backers say is a model for the rest of the country.

The measure approved unanimously by Washington City Council prevents assets taken by police from going to the department, and instead earmarks them for the U.S. capital's general fund.

Forfeiture laws let police seize property from people they stop, regardless of criminal charges. Seizures can include cash, cars and homes, which police are permitted to keep or sell.

It has been estimated that up to 90 percent of civil forfeitures occur without a criminal charge, according to the bill's author, City Council member Tommy Wells. He also said the law wrongfully gave police a financial incentive to make seizures.

The legislation overhauls the current law and provides property owners more protection, providing due process before police or prosecutors can seize property.

"This is absolutely a model for other states and cities," said Darpana Sheth, an attorney for the Institute for Justice, a nonprofit civil liberties law firm in Arlington, Virginia. "Ideally, it would be eliminated. But short of that, reform is welcome."

Critics say some law enforcement agencies abuse forfeiture laws, which were created to fight organized crime. The value of seized assets grew to $4.3 billion nationwide in 2012 from $407 million in 2001, according to the Washington Post. Over that period, police seized $2.5 billion in cash from almost 62,000 people without warrants or indictments.