Cuban War Criminal Touring U.S.

Article Type: 
Published Date: 
Monday, November 18, 2002

Victor Dreke and the Real Story of the Escambray Wars

On Nov. 13, 2002, Victor Dreke, a Cuban Communist Party official, ­ and a man accused of committing war crimes during the Escambray wars of the early 1960s in Cuba, ­ spoke at a North Miami forum hosted by Florida International University.

According to the Miami Herald, although there were protests outside the ballroom where the forum was held and a handful of Cuban exiles within shouted asesino! ("assassin"), the majority of the crowd offered a standing ovation to the communist official!

But the affair does not end there.

Incredibly, Dreke's special visa allows him to stay in the U.S. through the end of this month, touring the country sharing his "historic experiences" and promoting his book, From the Escambray to Congo: In the Whirlwind of the Cuban Revolution, published last year in both English and Spanish by Pathfinder Press. Could you imagine exiled writers such as Guillermo Cabrera Infante (Mea Cuba), Enrique Encinosa (Cuba en Guerra) or Juan Clark (Cuba: Mito y Realidad) touring Cuba and promoting their books in the very belly of the totalitarian beast?Che in Congo

Who is Comandante Victor Emilio Dreke Cruz? He was Ernesto "Ché" Guevara's (photo, right) second in command in the ill-fated military expedition to the African Congo in 1965, as well as one of the commanders of the so-called Lucha Contra Bandido ("War Against Bandits"), a genocidal war waged against the anti-communist campesinos of the Escambray mountains in Las Villas province. (1)

A Cuban government Web site declares that on July 8, 1999, Dreke testified in Havana at a "popular provincial tribunal" that indeed he fought in the Escambray wars against the "CIA-backed" anti-communist "bandits" (the alzados) and goes on to describe his "heroic" exploits in that drawn-out sanguinary genocidal war to impose communist rule over the rural population of the area.

At the Cuban government Web site he goes on to repeatedly call the campesino anti-communist rebels bandidos ("bandits"), as Fidel Castro pre-emptively decided to demonize them before launching his overwhelming communist offensive.

But the campesinos turned out to be hard nuts to crack, and it took more than six years (1960-1966) and over 6,000 communist casualties before the heroic rebels were crushed by overwhelming communist forces. (2)

Rather than being "bandits" and "instruments of a policy of sabotage and terror" financed by the U.S. government and backed by the CIA, as Dreke described them, the anti-communist Osvaldo Ramirezalzado rebels, who operated in the Escambray mountains of my native Las Villas province, were mostly humble campesinos (peasants), led not by Batistianos but by former revolutionaries of the 13th of March Revolutionary Directorate (RD) movement, like the valiant Osvaldo Ramírez (pictured on right in photo), who fought against Batista but later felt betrayed by the Revolution.

For most of the revolutionaries of the anti-communist RD movement, Fidel Castro's Marxist revolution was a profound betrayal of the insurrection against the former dictator Fulgencio Batista.

Like the kulaks of the former Soviet Union exterminated by Red Czar Joseph Stalin during the 1920s and 1930s, the alzados were campesinos and guajiros (rural people) who rebelled and fought the communist troops that had, at the point of a gun, taken their land and forced them into collective farms in the name of agrarian reform.

As I wrote in Cuba in Revolution — Escape From a Lost Paradise (page 106): "...Towards the end of 1961, Law 988 decreed that by virtue of being 'outlaws,' alzados forfeited both their lives and their property, and could be shot on sight or fusilados if apprehended."

It's well known that between 3,500 to 5,000 alzados (and campesino sympathizers) were killed in the bloody Escambray wars (casualties mounted on both sides particularly during the sanguinary year of 1963 that the regime itself called the Año del Cuero Duro, "the Year of the Tough Hide") or executed after their capture by the communist Death of Osvaldo Ramirezregime. In fact, these figures are in agreement with communist apologist writers like Norberto Fuentes, who remains friendly to the ideals of the totalitarian regime.

Dreke himself participated in the ghastly execution of alzado leader Margarito Lanza Flores (Tondike), a black Cuban. Tondike was surrounded by communist forces in a sugar cane field, which was set ablaze. Tondike tried to dig his way out to escape the flames, only to be savagely burned and apprehended. Without having medical assistance rendered, he was pulled to the side of a creek and summarily executed by Dreke, another black Cuban.

Dreke mentions a number of "crimes" committed by the alzados, ignoring the greater crimes of the communist dictatorship. He mentions U.S. assistance to the anti-communist rebels and even calls them "bandits," "the military arm of the CIA," when in fact the aid rendered to the rebels was scanty, few and far between, almost nil.

Following the Bay of Pigs debacle and the missile crisis incident, as I wrote in Cuba in Revolution (page 418): "Minimal assistance came from the U.S. via the CIA because of policies emanating out of 'plausable deniability' and the Kennedy-Khrushchev pact, which prevented U.S. assistance to the freedom fighters. Again and again, the intrepid rebel leader, Commander Osvaldo Ramírez, had to turn away new alzados because of lack of arms and equipment."

The limiting factors in the Escambray wars were insufficient and inadequate U.S. assistance and the lack of arms and ammunition that could be supplied by the Cuban populace, which had been disarmed.

Dreke mentions alzados as the "bandits" and "Tomassevich" as the hero in the same breath. There was no greater bandit in the whole Escambray rebellion than Comandante Raúl Menéndez Tomassevich. Tomassevich was imprisoned in 1955 for trying to cash bad checks and perpetrating fraud. After his release, he joined Castro's 26th of July movement, where his penchant for crime and violence paid off as a revolutionary with a cause.William Morgan

Dreke mentions William Morgan in passing and takes another opportunity to blame the [American] "imperialism" for the "counterrevolution." Comandante Morgan was, in fact, a brave American who took up the Cuban cause for freedom, another 13th of March RD (later "Second Front") revolutionary, who "fought for the Revolution but not for communism." I described his end in Cuba in Revolution (page 107):

"Comandante William Morgan, an American adventurer who had found his calling with the RD in 1957, was implicated in an assassination attempt against Fidel Castro and executed in 1961 in Fortaleza de la Cabaña. ... Morgan did not make it to the paredón de fusilamiento (firing squad wall). With Fidel and Raúl Castro present, the RD commander was told to get on his knees and plead for his life. He responded firmly and without hesitation, 'I don't kneel in front of any man.' A communist captain then shot him in both knees to forcibly prostrate him. When Morgan tried to get up, he was shot in both shoulders. He exsanguinated without ever reaching el paredón (the wall)."

Morgan is the type of man that Dreke vilified in the service of the communist regime. Why was Morgan "implicated"? Because among other things, he declared he was not a communist.

(Photo above shows: 1) Fidel Castro, commander-in-chief of rebel army; 2) Osvaldo Dorticos, president of the "republic," and behind Dorticos and Fidel is Raul Roa, foreign minister; 3) Che Guevara, commander of La Cabana; 4) Ramiro Valdes, later Minister of the Interior; 5) Camilo Cienfuegos, chief of the Second Column and Camp Columbia; 6) William Morgan, commander of the Second Front of the Escambray; and 7) Eloy Gutierrez Menoyo, commander of the Second Front.

Suffice to say that the communist Dreke was one of those who accompanied Ernesto (Ché) Guevara on his ill-fated expedition to the African Congo. One of the many ironies of the Congolese debacle was that while the expedition was led by a white Argentinian, the group was composed mostly of black Cubans like Dreke and Henry Villegas Tamayo ("Pombo"). (Villegas was to follow Ché Guevara to Bolivia in 1966 [photo, below], the Argentinian's greatest and final debacle.)Che in Bolivia 1967

The black Cubans were horrified to see their Marxist African brothers practicing cannibalism in the midst of warfare ­ ferociously devouring the liver, heart and other body parts of the fallen enemy.

Not only were the Cubans beaten and scattered in the African jungle, but the 58th Company commando unit of "Mad Mike" Hoare, the legendary British mercenary, and Rip Robertson of the CIA was made up of exiled anti-communist Cubans. (3)

And as I discussed in Cuba in Revolution (page 250-251): "In the 1960s, when Ché Guevara abandoned his defeated troops in the Congo near Lake Tanganika, [Major General Arnaldo] Ochoa was there to pick up the pieces and bring the deserted troops back to Cuba. ..." The highly decorated Cuban general and war hero would be executed in 1989 as a scapegoat to shield the Castro brothers against allegations of drug trafficking. (4)

Cuba in RevolutionBecause Dreke is a black communist, he is now being paraded around the U.S. as an opponent of racism and a promoter of human rights, touting "Cuba's contribution to the welfare of native Africans and Afro-Cubans." He is not being asked to explain the anti­civil rights and unjust imprisonment of Vladimiro Roca, Dr. Oscar Elias Biscet, Jorge Luis Garcia Perez ("Antunez") and hundreds of other black Cubans who have spent years in prison because of their yearning for freedom.

Such is the state of U.S. academia today that Dreke, a communist and accused war criminal, has been converted to an intellectual and his revisionist book, "From the Escambray to Congo: In the Whirlwind of the Cuban Revolution," hailed as a great work of history.

Defending his invitation to Dreke to speak at a forum in Miami, Florida International University President Dr. Modesto A. Maidique wrote:

"My role as the president of FIU obliges me to protect and defend the right of faculty who have invited these emissaries from Cuba to speak on our campus. Our faculty at FIU have autonomy through academic freedom, to invite whomever they see fit, even when the President and the administration of the university are not in agreement with the ideas the guests may espouse. I call upon all in the community to understand and respect the liberties that this country offers to us."

Knowledgeable citizens are not convinced of Dr. Maidique's sincerity. Jorge Maspons of New Orleans, Louisiana, wrote him: "Mr. Dreke is a criminal who should be put on trial after the liberation of Cuba. ... I am a proud American Vietnam veteran. You can be assured that this action is an insult, not only to me, but to all American war veterans who went to combat to exterminate subjects such as Mr. Dreke."

And Rosa C. Novellas-Bengochea of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, replied to Dr. Maidique: "[My opposition to the invitation] was never a matter of different or opposing ideas; we respect and defend the rights of others to disagree. We are law-abiding citizens that fled oppression and came to the United States, our home, in search of liberty, justice and the rights that were denied to us by a totalitarian regime. Many were not so lucky and were taken to the firing squads by your guest for simple dissent. How can you place the fear of losing your job and role as president [of FIU] in front of ethics and principles?"

Yes, such is the state of ethics and politics of the Ivory Tower of academia ­ even after the collapse of the USSR ­ that the modern-day academician-alchemists continue in their quest to transmute the white creamy color of the elephant tusk into the bloodied red color of Marxism.

* * * * * *

Miguel A. Faria Jr., M.D., author of Cuba in Revolution: Escape From a Lost Paradise (2002; and Editor-in-Chief of the Medical Sentinel of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), is Clinical Professor of Surgery (Neurosurgery, ret.) and Adjunct Professor of Medical History (ret.), Mercer University School of Medicine.


1. Faria, MA Jr. Cuba in Revolution: Escape From a Lost Paradise. Macon, GA, Hacienda Publishing, Inc., 2002, pp. 88-104.

2. Ibid., pp. 105-115.

3. Encinosa E. Cuba en Guerra: Historia de la Oposición Anti-Castrista 1959-1993. Miami, FL, The Endowment for Cuban American Studies of the Cuban American National Foundation, 1995, pp. 171-175.

4. Faria, op. cit., pp. 250-255.

Your rating: None Average: 5 (7 votes)
Comments on this post

Cuba's adventurism in Africa

Re. My Review of the Video Documentary "Cuba: An African Odyssey" (DVD; 2007), which I posted on Jan 9, 2012, I received via Amazon the following comment:

Mr. Victor Van Der Weerden (June 10, 2012) says:

Re. " ' Mobutu Sese Seko (1930-1997), who eventually won and ruled with an iron hand as a socialist dictator.' "

"This statement is blatantly false, Mobutu was a fervent anti-communist. Mira aqui: [A website at Davidson edu]

"Also what is your source for this statement "I am also in accord with this reviewer about the venial situation of the Angolan communist regime and Western oil companies propping up the corrupt regime and accepting protection from the Cuban army in the oil fields. This is not discussed, I suppose, because it would taint the revolutionary image of Agostinho Neto, head of the MPLA and later communist dictator of Angola?"

My response to which I received no replies:

Sir, Indeed, I reaffirm it, "Mobutu Sese Seko (1930-1997), won [the Congolese civil war] and ruled with an iron hand as a socialist dictator."

No tengo que mirar, Senor. There is a difference both in degrees and methodologies between socialism and communism, although the two philosophies sit next to each other in the left side of the political spectrum. Francois Mitterrand, for example, was a popular French Socialist President, yet he aligned himself with the West and U.S. President Ronald Reagan against communism and the evil empire of the USSR! He was a socialist who abhorred communism, just to his political left!

Both Mobutu and Mitterrand were "fervent anti-communist," and yet they were socialists, so what? The point is, sir that they both sit on the left side of the political spectrum. Your assertion that my statement "was blatantly false" is a false assertion! Such an assertion deserves an apology if made by a gentleman, but not an ideologue!

As to my statement about Agostinho Neto and the cozy relationship between the oil companies, namely:

"... the venial situation of the Angolan communist regime and Western oil companies propping up the corrupt regime and accepting protection from the Cuban army in the oil fields. This is not discussed, I suppose, because it would taint the revolutionary image of Agostinho Neto, head of the MPLA and later communist dictator of Angola."

I also stand firm. Anyone familiar with the situation in Angola in the 1970s and 1980s, as I have explained, should require no reference, academic or popular, to back up the statement. Why? Because it was and remains an open secret! The situation was as I described in my review and any reputable source would confirm it. National Review had several investigative articles at the time which should be easy to find. Google the subject- the references, academic or popular, are legion for anyone truly interested in this subject, as you sir, appear to be! MAF

I thought these comments would be of interest under this article. My Review of the Documentary is in Random Notes: "Movies and Documentaries."